I agree. Big huge asses well as big huge boobs, while fun to look at when younger become very problematic later in life. I much prefer a smaller more toned situation because it tends to hold up better over time. Girls with asses like the Brazilian chick or any Kardashian are a quick fat and pretty much just a weekend of bad eating away from being totally gross.
I am pro big butts and am the proud owner of one, but it better have some muscle under there or you will droop as you age. The saddest asses I've seen are the squarebutts. They come in sizes small to large but the owners tend to have lower muscle tone and bodies whose flab is slowly being dragged down by gravity.
If people really want to do this right, they should take the kids from the Oncology wing and have a day for them in a park and do some fun things. I'm sure people have wanted to do this, however this is way less interesting than Batkid.
Maybe I'm weird but Emma Watson does nothing for me. She's attractive, but it's a little blown out of proportion. Katy Perry on the other hand... God damn. She could just finish having diarrhea from Mexican food and Id still tongue punch that fart box.
Emma Watson is hot in a vacuum, and just a very attractive girl with an accent otherwise. Her thing is more the appeal that she might know she's not a Katy Perry, but will quietly rock your cock behind the scenes. She definitely is getting points for being famous. Katy Perry is hot period.
The amount of discussion of how hot women are actually not hot that goes on here is fucking baffling. You people must never date, gotta be a perfect 10 for you to grace her with your cock. You remind me of some douche friends I had in college who bitched about never having a girlfriend but yet had standards so high that they just came off as delusion.
Emma Watson seems like a really pretty square to me. I remember her talking about going to school in the States and how shocked how "Guys would just ask me out" and "None of them wore jackets and ties to class." Maybe that's a Brit attitude, I have no idea but it sounds square.
Personally I only date dime pieces and aspiring actresses, or gymnast, if they're a gymnast or former gymnast I'll give them a pass even if they only have meh looks.
This is better than more than a few Hollywood movies I've seen recently: http://www.awsm.com/13883/now-this-is-how-you-use-a-go-pro/
She's lucky we wore pants to class. More than one occasion I looked like Nick Nolte on 4th of July. And I commuted. The dudes that lived in the dorm were John Bonham on the day he died. I would have loved to have been in a class with that girl. Because in my fantasy she is charmed by the smell of rum and constantly interrupting her with Harry Potter jokes. "Prematuris Ejaculamos!" "Is it true Ron Weasley would beat underage fans for the sexual thrill?" "Tell me what kind of lover Alan Rickman is." Plus leg: Spoiler
I wouldn't call Emma Watson "hot" cause that implies some sort of implicit sex appeal. I don't find her terribly sexy, but I think she's absolutely gorgeous, in a completely natural and genetically gifted way. And in a way that she's gonna be beautiful her entire life. You could do a whole lot worse.
There are girls who are beautiful, then there are ones that are sexy (a ravenous, sultry appeal comes to mind) and then there are both. I rate Mia Kirshner as a both. In her prime, a woman like Sharon Stone was both. Total Recall/Basic Instinct Stone. Hell yeah.
My friend was able to use her dad's timeshare for Saturday night at no cost to us, and it's pretty sweet. Two bedrooms and baths. Kitchen. Not too shabby. And it's free! I also liked the Fireball. It was our celebratory first shot. Pop tarts were decent also. Brown sugar and cinnamon in case you were wondering.
And this is what you'd wake up too. Granted, that is a terrible angle, terrible face she is making, and just awful lighting, but Let's face it, all these women are made up like crazy and shot at flattering angles to make them look ideal. Ask any woman here if they look "ideal" on a day to day basis. I'm guessing no. So then the real question is which is naturally hotter? As in, which looks better sans makeup on a day to day basis, not when they're made up for videos, photo shoots, premiers, or movies. In this case, I'm going to have to say Emma Watson would beat Katy Perry. Just my opinion.
Ah...um..I think you pull both of them out of bed, put them into a bikini, drop them into a pool and watch both of them walk out, Katy Perry wins. Just that body is ridiculous. Spoiler Spoiler