3 words: "Pretty, young, girl." If she was an overweight middle aged woman none of us would've heard about it.
Yeah, but this one included a creepy dude. And a van. That makes it uni....oh, wait. I've got nuthin'.
wait the dude is literally hiding in like the swamp? I've tried my best to avoid the news, last I heard he just wasn't speaking to authorities on advice of counsel (which is smart imo). Has it gotten worse?
They thought he was in the house up until they entered it yesterday and it turns out he skedaddled into the swamp. Hopefully to take himself out of the gene pool.
but someone said his family was protecting him? Is this one of those "afluenza" things? Also I'm of the thinking that killing yourself after something like this, or even getting the death penalty, is the easy way out. Life in prison would be so, so much worse. That, along with the death penalty being much more expensive to litigate (a secondary concern), is the entire reason why I don't support the death penalty. Let these fuckers rot in a hell of their own making. They earned it.
I guess I've become a bit of a conspiracy theorist the last couple years. The Sussmann indictment appears to suggest they might've spoofed DNS activity to create a link between Trump and Alfa bank, which is what Ankura apparently found a couple years ago. If the hack of the DNC was done by Russians, would they have needed to create extra evidence? That, and long-standing discrepancies with Comey saying the FBI couldn't get access to the servers, etc - I've always had questions. Crowdstrike plugged in their Falcon product which apparently immediately showed them Russians were active in the network but couldn't stop or see the exfiltration of emails that continued for a couple weeks after they got on site. Seems odd. Any technically savvy people here? How easy would it be to attribute the hack to the Russians, having to provide at least some information to the FBI, but ultimately running a false flag operation?
Apparently he took off for the swamp on Tuesday. His family didn't think it was important to tell anyone about it.
so another manhunt is gonna begin then. If the pythons or alligators or floridamen don't get him first
It started yesterday. Personally, I'm rooting for the gators. Preferably two of them latching onto him simultaneously and fighting over their screaming prize as they rip it apart.
Countdown to tv movie about it begins when they find her body...his body....or the trial? Ooooh the drama...
People aren’t going to worry why a woman from the Midwest is missing. They’d rather pray for a plague to wipe them all out.
You forgot "white" as well. Our news, and societal conscious, don't seem to care about people of color in the same capacity. Then the most garish version has politics shoehorned in like the Mollie Tibbetts case. They only thing we crave more is the hot white women murderers. I finally checked the story out because the guy lived in the city just outside where our beach house used to be. Dont see what is so lurid about this case (outside the fact she is good looking). Young couple with mental health issues get into domestic violence situations and the girl winds up dead. Turns out to be quite common.
Kind of. It wasn't just the sensors that detected the activity, Crowdstrike deployed their incident response team to do a forensic analysis of log and traffic data. This was then validated by two other cybersecurity firms.
I will say this, as someone who listens to too much true crime through wireless headphones while doing other things: the boyfriend was smart in his refusal to cooperate with the police. Almost all cases that you read about are broken or solved because the dumbass who did it sat down for a six-hour interview with professional interrogators from either the police or the FBI. Should you ever get arrested, or even be QUESTIONED about something, here's how the conversation should go: Scenario #1: Police: Would you like to come down to the station so we can take your statement? Answer: No. Scenario #2: Police: Let's go to the station. We need to talk and I'm sure you'd like this cleared up. Answer: Am I under arrest? Police: No, but if you don't speak with us right now we won't be able to help you after the case moves on. Answer: No. Scenario #3: Police: You are under arrest. Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law. Answer: I want a lawyer and I will not speak to anyone until I see legal counsel. Here's something that blew me away: in Canada, you have no right to legal representation while being interrogated. AND, if you ask for a lawyer, they don't have to get you one nor do they have to stop talking to you. That, to me, is completely messed up. So the moral of the story is: never talk to the police. This guy might appear to be stupid; he had a very public road trip solo with the victim, the police were called the day prior and they were clearly in a violent domestic dispute, she disappeared without a trace and he kept all her stuff and drove her van home without her. All that being said...it's fully conjecture and they don't even have enough to arrest him, provided he shuts the fuck up and doesn't cooperate. He's at least smarter - so far - then every other person who thinks they can beat the interrogators at their own game.
I watch those psychological breakdowns of famous interrogations on YouTube all the time. It blows my mind how much people just freely give up or even agree to sit down in the first place. On the other end some of the lying and tactics the police are allowed to use should be fucking criminal.
I have to expand on this...I agree with you that almost no one sees themselves as the villain. I think, though, that most guilty people who agree to interrogation are there because of ego and hubris. They either think they're smarter than whoever is questioning them, or they think they can get away with it if they cling to their story. Most people have no experience whatsoever with the adrenaline dump, or how they're perceived under stress. So they telegraph all their lies because they're not responding how one would if they were truly innocent. Like KK said, though, the tactics that are legal are insane. You can put so much pressure on people that they'll confess just so they make it stop.
Guilt or innocence doesn't matter. Humans have biases and if a cop decides you're the one who did the crime it can go really badly for you. Lots of innocent people in jail because of "confessions" or their words being used against them during hours of interrogation.