https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-c...ps-first-official-speech-three-months-1597932 Ruh-roh, Shraggy.
he also wore his pants backward What I haven't seen pointed out, is that it looks like he's also wearing the adult diaper he usually wears underneath them.
I'm still confused how this is possible. His pants didn't fall down, which means the fly had to be closed, but if the pants are backwards that means the fly is over his ass. It's not something you can achieve by just being absentminded; closing a fly over your ass is an intentional and completely novel behavior.
Yeah I saw the pics. Do you think they were backwards or it was a diaper. You would think someone would tell him they were on backwards.
Or you just have dress pants loose enough you can put them on without unbuttoning and unzipping. Grainy vid makes it a little suspicious on manipulation in post. Not that I want to go on a deep dive of higher resolution shots of Trump's crotch at that event to confirm anything but that is an awfully grainy video in this day and age. But we can do three day news cycles of him drinking water or walking down a ramp but dementia Joe is just being unsuccessfully targeted about his clear cognitive issues. This is what our world has come down to.
It was all the creasing that got me. The lack of a zipper could have been either just the shadows and photography, or the pants were those pull up sweats like nett said, but that creasing is not something that happens naturally, unless you're wearing something like a diaper under it to get it all bunched up
To be fair, that law is a little silly in the first place. It’s basically an arbitrary list of things some moron thought sounded scary, which is what almost every gun control law ends up being. I don’t know how you include forward grips and grenade launchers in the same category. I’m generally fine with reasonable gun control laws, but this stuff needs to at least make a bit of sense.
After handing out cookies on Air Force 2 gets poor reception, VP Kamala Harris hires Cecilia Giménez to restore her image.
"In the 94-page decision, Judge Roger Benitez compared an AR-15 rifle to a “Swiss army knife” and falsely claimed that more Californians had died from the Covid-19 vaccine than from mass shootings." This statement alone pretty much assures that his decision will be overturned.
You sure about that? California has had over 63,000 deaths from COVID so far... how many people do you think get killed by mass shootings in California?
Yeah, but I didn't see that anywhere in the linked article or the summary I read, so assumed it was a typo.
All the articles I’ve read have highlighted the Swiss Army knife analogy much more than the vaccine part. Given the modular nature of the AR platform and it’s endless adaptability I can’t think of a much more apt description. He’s also saying, poorly worded, that death by the vaccine (that is infinitesimally rare) is analogous to being killed by an assault rifle in a mass shooting (itself an infinitesimally rare event). He didn’t do himself any favors as obviously detractors are going to lump him into some antivaxxers nonsense.