Hot or Not?

I'm a fan of beautiful women, and I can find beauty (without the aid of alcohol) in all of the original categories listed, for the exception of the insane body builder. For all intents and purposes, she's more a man than a woman. It has nothing to do with her strength over mine--she just looks hard, like I'd be fucking a boulder.

My fiance is probably in the "skinny fat"-to-curvy area, with nice large tits and great hips. My last long-term girlfriend before her was a diver, and fell into the "fit" category.

Frankly, as long as the woman isn't way at one end of the spectrum or the other, the body type is fine by me.

For reference, the woman to the left in the "curvy" picture is Candice Huffine. Go search for some pics on Google Images (some nsfw). She's gorgeous.

 

Not picking on you specifically, but to all of the "guys" who are afraid of the cultfit chicks:

I get it if you don't find them attractive, but those girls are not fucking bulky by any means. They are fit and attractive. If you want bulky, google Megan Avalon. They might be bulky if you're a 21st century metrosexual pussified male who needs help changing a tire, but Crossfit women are smoking hot.

Fear them all you want. That just means there's more for me and the other men who still have a shred of masculinity.

 

Every one of those women, with the exception of the body builder and I'm sure there is someone out there that is drooling over her, is attractive.

I'm just assuming the first chick does in fact have a head.

 

I think my problem is while I like a fit (but not outright ripped) girl, I like soft facial features, and I find most girls in great shape have very angular defined faces which are not as much my thing (likely a product of very little fat in the face).

Body wise I like good shape, but am fine with skinny-fat now and then as I like softness.

 

Excellent point, I didn't even think about this. Along with the the decrease apparent bulk when they aren't lifting weights or just finished lifting weights they also don't have veins that look like they are trying to break free from the skin.

 

Thats a man right?

 

My most desired is fit, but not bulky. If a girl can maintain an awesome athletic tone but not get too freakishly ripped then I'd chase after her like a madman.

I think it's kind of sad that after looking at the average, skinnyfat picture I've realized thats the type of girls I've hooked up most with. Just plain old boring.

"Curvy" chicks? eh yeah maybe. Pour me a shot first of something strong.

 

See, I see the girl posted in Dcc's opening post as too bulky. I'd totally sleep with Megan Avalon.
And I completely agree. Also from my personal experience fit girls tend to be more comfortable getting naked and have higher libidos, but that's purely from personal experience. I tend to be somewhat aggressive, so if we keep switching positions and you need a break I'll be somewhat disappointed.

 

I suppose bulky wasn't the right way to describe the crossfit girl in the original pic. She's much more ripped than any average or fit girl is, and when I'm judging based on pure physical appearance, I don't find it as appealing. Don't get me wrong though, there is definitely something to be said for a girl that can take care of herself and show the kind of dedication it takes to achieve that body.

I'm just going off of personal experience on this issue because at the crossfit I trained at previously, there were so many of the fit girl types there, but as time went on, their bodies hardened up just a little too much for me and the attractiveness started to decrease as well. It's not a matter of being afraid of them, just that I saw it too much and prefer the other types instead.

 

Can I play too????

Definitely the fit but not bulky girl. I watched a bit of those crossfit challenges on TV last week and didn't see much softness. As somebody else mentioned, their faces even looked hard. But I guess that was indicative of the extreme considering they were competing, shimmered is a crossfit gal and her face and body aren't quite as angular and hard.

As an aside, I like my guys fit but not bulky too.

 

She great, like most of the women I’ve dated. But she would look a lot better if those shorts weren't cutting into her, making a muffin top where one wouldn't normally be.

She looks fine.

Too muscular. It would be like cuddling with a piece of beef jerky.

No. That woman would rape me with her steroid-enlarged clit. I just know it. Look up a picture of Denise Masino if you want to know what I’m talking about. I will not link to any pictures of her.

Those women look amazing. I would do such bad things to them. That back crease that the one on the left has? Oh yeah.

I don’t want a woman to be in better shape than I am.

 

My absolute ideal body type isn't one of the choices. I live curvy, but a little slimmer than the girls in the photo and more of a classic hourglass shape. Some celebrities off the top of my head are (might as well start off with the controversial one) Christina Hendricks, Kate Winslet, Beyonce, Sofia Vergara, Amanda Seyfried, Selma Hayek etc.

 

Selma Hayek, J-Lo, ....GGRRRRRRRRRRRROARR.

Or maybe I just have a thing for latin chicks.

 

Megan is hot, but she is a bit bulky.

As far as the fit girls having higher libidos, all you have to do is hang around a fitness competition or any competitive women's sports team to see this is absolutely 100% true.

 

Yes, I agree with this. I think DCC stacked the deck with her photo choices. The skinnyfat one is an unflattering, "look at her muffin-top" photo, the curvy girls (while beautiful) are on the higher end of the curvy weight spectrum, and the fit girl is an absolute smokeshow.

If "curvy" had featured a picture of Vergara or Hayek, I think you'd see different results. Same if "skinny fat" had been an attractive girl of skinny to average build (Allison Brie?).

 

Kate Winslet is a good call. I think her body has looked better with age, which is rare.

The last two curvy girls are definitely the sexiest, especially the one on the left. I cannot fathom why anyone would pick the middle two body types. Muscles like that just doesn't suit women.

 

The "skinny fat" is without a doubt the least attractive body-type to me. It's just so plain, boring, and very vanilla. Many ladies are like this so there's nothing special about it, not to mention I don't find it attractive at all.

I really like fit girls and even crossfit type chicks. I know some have complained about them being too bulky but that doesn't bother me. These two types are extremely hot. I'm a fan of great asses and these two categories seem to have the ones that suit my taste the best.

The curvy girls are alright. They have big asses which I thoroughly enjoy but some curvy girls can be a little too big for my taste.

The bodybuilder type of chicks are harder to fit into one category. I've seen some that have clearly taken steroids and have a manly face and voice. This "manly" type is a definite no go. However, I've seen some who are still feminine, like to dress up, wear heels and dresses and look amazing while doing so. They have super sexy calves and tight asses. I would by lying to you if I said I didn't want to sink my dick into them. I know some people think that this is sick and that these type of women are too masculine but I'm okay with some muscle as long as they're still ladies. Once the voice drops and the face changes, no way. The feminine ones look as though they could fuck the shit out of you then would let you take them to dinner.

 

The fit girl is attractive but would not be my first choice. The girls I'm traditionally attracted to are softer and have more pronounced curves. I'm thinking more like a Ferrari. The women that immediately come to mind are Sofia Vergara, Meagan Good, Nikki Cox, Salma Hayek, Dagmara Dominczyk, Scarlett Johannsen, Maja Ivarsson, Haifa Wehbe, and Amelia Zidane.

 

I think DCC's version of "curvy" is a girl who wears a few extra pounds very well. Not a chick with a big butt, huge rack and a flat stomach.