I was in LA for vacation this week, didn't have time to do any goddamn research. This is what the NFL fucking said about Antonio fucking Gates. "Analysis: Gates, who caught six passes for 81 yards in Week 1, is out there if you need him this week, but his matchup appears less than optimal." Might as well just say he's a warm body with two hands. I should have played him know the Patriots would run the fuck out of the ball after a bad O-line Brady game to get the line active.
"If" doesn't mean shit, I know that. This week is a loss, not because of drafting but because I couldn't research. Anyway, IF I played Antonio Gates. The score would be 100.1 to 92.45 with Nick Foles + Eagles D going tonight vs L. McCoy and J. Maclin. Then again if he played Mark Ingram or Darren McFadden instead of Pierre Thomas it could have been a game as well. Or the Redskins D. Oh Fantasy Football, how I love you. I just hate the fuckers I play with.
Yeah not starting Ingram was stupid on my part, I gotta do something at QB though, Rapeyburger isn't getting shit done.
Oh come on, who were you going to put in Eli? We were tied going into tonight and you had no one playing while I had Hakeem Nicks, you deserved to lose. The only reason it looks like that is because Nicks had the worst game he ever had in his career.
I was considering Hopkins, actually. And I expected to lose, but you have to admit that losing b/c of one reception for -4 yard is probably the grossest way to go, even if you were a heavy fave.
I'm going to make the same complaint as last year: the tiebreaking stystem is stupid. It doesn't really matter right now, but could by the end of the season. Right now I'm behind zyron and free corps for opaque reasons (not only have we not played, we don't even have common opponents! I think it's strength of opponents?). Points for is the obvious and best tiebreaking system. With bye weeks, player matchups, etc. varying all over the please, and the fact that you don't actually play against your opponent in any strategic fashion, head to head doesn't make nearly as much sense as in actual football.
To answer Parker's question, I'll offer one of my top 3 RBs and/or Marshall if the QB is named Brees, Luck, Rodgers, or Peyton Manning. Preference is to move Charles/Lacy, then Foster/Marshall. For other starting quality QBs (Foles, Ryan, Brady, Cam, Stafford, Rivers, Wilson, and maybe Kap), everyone else is on the table but not those 4 players unless you sweeten the deal.
That was probably the fairest trade you've ever made. Given the fact we now know the Saints secondary could be beat by any SEC offense and the Falcon's performance is going to be more like what we saw against the Bengals. Atlanta is going up against decent defenses this year, and not sure its going to be consistent. Matt Ryan is going to give you a few mind blowing games, but definitely not a QB1. But way better than RG3. You should have gotten Cousins from someone, he might be good. Given the way the Jets played and how Geno is playing, I feel much better about Chris Ivory. He's not going to wrecking defenses, but he's going to get a few goal line TDs when CJ can't break through. Also, I have no idea what Crabtree is going to do, given that Kaep gets a little careless, but with Vernon Davis out, he's going to be targeted a lot.
Both the trades that went down were terrible. Did you really give up a top 5 QB for fucking Crabtree and Ivory? I know the rest of your team sucks, but Jesus, have some dignity. I also changed the settings to make you pig fuckers happy. I will say if I end up out of the playoffs and the fuck face that is ahead of me I've beaten twice this year, I'm going to delete the league and burn all your fucking money in an epic YouTube video.