Splish Splosh goes the cock, then the party must stop

I can't believe there are people out in Dumbfuckistan that are shocked and appalled by this. Why? A chick that acts like a whore turns out to be one. Knock me over with a feather. Any retard worth their weight in shit knows that pictures go on the internet, and then they're there to stay. Anybody who thinks she was "conned" or "mislead" into this "scandal" was not in line when they were passing out brains.

And I mean, JESUS does she looks like she just stepped out of the conductor booth of the Methwhore Train in that photo or WHAT?!!?

 

Someone, please remind me who this Ke$ha person is? I haven't a clue.

 

I dunno. Some stars have been heat-scored with just about ANYTHING and they still skated in the end. Look at Madonna. Really. LOOK AT HER, or...she'll die. Madonna fucked the entire NBA including the trainers while she was dating Dick Tracy. She made a pictorial book called simply "Sex" (Look, mom! I'm an author!) that features her naked in bed with Vanilla Ice. Seriously. Nowadays, she considered a humanitarian that writes Children's books and still sells out stadiums.

Don't forget, the "Me Generation" are idiots. I will not be shocked in the least if this does anything but boost this no-talent slut's career (though I doubt her fellow Lillith Fair tour friends are happy with her right now). Hell, if she does anal or fisting it will boost her career. I mean, pop-schmuck Katy Perry is shooting whip cream out of her tits in her new video, so where do you go from there? If you can't shock the public nowadays, you're not doing it right.

 

Right, but there's a huge difference. In the first case, you simply READ that a girl is slutty. No big deal.

Here, you SEE the girl in question covered in cum. Granted, there's nothing shocking about it, but it's still disgusting and embarrassing. It would be the same if it were instead a picture of her taking a shit. Everyone does it, but most people don't want to see the pictorial evidence.

It won't increase her popularity, but it won't hurt it, either. She won't attract any new fans, but probably won't alienate many of her current ones. Really, it's not much of a "scandal" in terms of its outcome. Things will essentially stay the same.

 

I can't be the only one who disagrees with the use of the word covered. I was expecting some bukkake style chest painting. That picture is what, maybe a 5 roper?

 

On the presumption that the cum on her chest belongs to an ex-boyfriend, how is this slutty? The definition of sluttiness is not engaging in sex, but engaging in it promiscuously and without having discriminating tastes.

Call me a progressive limp-wristed feminist if you want, but I prefer to call myself a materialist. It's pretty much true by definition that any sexually active woman who is worth having sex with has had cum sprayed all over her at one time or another. The existence of photographical evidence does absolutely nothing to mitigate or precipitate this fact. The only thing the photo evidence is indicative of is that Kesha either didn't maintain positive control of the files on her computer or trusted the guy who owned the camera far too much.

 

Hell, people become famous just for being a filthy, pathetic slut. Look at Kim Kardashian. A lot of guys worship her on here besides the fact she's a complete and total germ farm. She's made HOW many pornos with low lives so far? She's fucked Joe Francis. That alone should award you a bullet to the head. She's also a fuckign RETARD, yet people worship her as a celebrity without having a single good use.

It boggles the mind.

 

I don't see how this matters in the least but it's always entertaining to see the crazies in society get all uppity about it.

Also, I think I'd fuck her(alt: I'd definitely fuck her). She's nothing special(alt: would be the hottest girl I've ever talked to) and I've had sex with better looking people(alt: I've thought about having sex with better looking people) but just for shits and giggles(alt: I'm a virgin).

 

I dunno about all this hate that's flying around. I'm not saying I listen to this chick in my house but when I'm out at a club and they play this shit chicks love it, and lets be honest if it gets tits and asses shaking there can't be too much wrong with it. So she's a vapid whore, most girls are, proof lies in Ke$ha, Brittney and Madonna's popularity.

I can't be the only one here that's disappointed about her tits being covered right?

 

Seconded. I'm sure a decent proportion of people here have either cum on or received a load from a significant other. Not everyone takes a photo of it but it still happens. So she fucked someone and they had a good time - meh, good for them. The only thing I'm disappointed with is the false advertising - that is hardly what I'd call 'covered'.

However this in no way excuses the abortions purporting to be music she puts out. If only her next release contained subliminal messages that induce her hordes of idiotic fans to commit mass suicide with a giant dildo the world would be a better place.

 

The slutty/disgusting part is having the pictures taken. Not the act itself, which is quite normal.

Oh really? So if a girl takes daily videos of herself taking shits, that would do "absolutely nothing to mitigate or precipitate the fact" that everyone takes shits, and it's no big deal? Great logic.

 

I don't understand. Why is it disgusting? People take what they consider to be sexy pictures of each other all the time, and have since the invention of the camera. Hell, what do you think polaroid cameras were for? You've never done that, or had someone do it to you? It's a normal part of being young and silly and playing with your sexuality - I don't understand how/when you became a puritan.

There is a HUGE difference between taking a shit and having an orgasm. Yes, everyone does both, but only a select few find shit sexy (and I really don't want to involve them. In anything. Ever.). Orgasms are almost universally regarded as sexy, or at least as a really excellent way to pass the time.

So, while most of us at least occasionally enjoy looking at pictures representing sex and orgasms, very few want to see pictures of shit, ever. I don't really understand how or why you would lump them together - the only common element is that they are biological functions. You might also have said pictures of someone sleeping, which wouldn't have been sexy or disgusting, but totally boring.

 

Humans have been commemorating things that they do since the caveman. Fucking is one of these things.

I have chosen to commemorate more than one of these rites and have retained posession of the evidence because I am NOT retarded. I know that some may not appreciate me taking it like a champ.

 

Stop kidding yourselves. It's jizz. It's a picture of jizz on someone famous available online. It's a big deal to lots of people.

God she looks awful in that pic.

 

That is because she is not attractive. She looks awful in all her pictures, a coat of jizz isn't going to improve the situation.

See:

 

Yes...and unless they're pictures one doesn't mind getting out to a larger public, or taken by a long-time spouse, it's fucking stupid.

In her case though, it's not just a naked picture (which would probably boost her popularity, as Crown Royal correctly noted, and be a shrewd move), but it's a non-nude picture of jizz on her stomach. For most people, that's not particularly "sexy". It does nothing for her fame or earning potential, either.

Haha, where do you get the idea that I'm a Puritan? Because I think a girl taking pictures of herself covered in jizz (non-nude, which is much worse) isn't sexually appealing, and since it won't do anything for her career, a stupid move? Are you joking or serious?

And yes, I've had it offered by girls, and always decline. Since I'm not a trashy pop singer, I would rather not have that stuff pop up 20 years now, when I'm settled down. Or for that matter, several months later, when we break up.

So you personally enjoy seeing cum? You find the sight of sperm really sexy?

That's perfectly fine, but I think that you are in the minority here. Forum? Is seeing cum on a fully/mostly clothed girl "universally sexy"?

To be fair, she seems moderately attractive. Nothing incredible, but pretty good. I would definitely hit it.

 

KIMaster, are you implying that you don't find cumshot-creampie-bukkakee compilations hot?

What are you, a puritan or something?

 

If she is naked, down to the individual orifices, then it's hot. Fully clothed? No.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that I would have been more appreciative of the photos if they featured her being fisted while shoving a cell phone up her ass.

 

Having seen you be interviewed at that IHTSBIH premier I am not unsure this was sarcasm masking truth.

 

We don't believe you.... and demand evidence.